Ligeså snart noget maskinelt ikke svarer det samme på samme spørgsmål to gange i træk, -burde- det være 100p diskvalificeret til at være i produktion – nogensinde.
Tofticles på Mastodon – Link til indlæg
Ligeså snart noget maskinelt ikke svarer det samme på samme spørgsmål to gange i træk, -burde- det være 100p diskvalificeret til at være i produktion – nogensinde.
Tofticles på Mastodon – Link til indlæg
I have never found an instance of “when am I ever going to need to know this?” that couldn’t be responded to with, “When people try to scam you by exploiting your ignorance.” Math? Statistics? Historical events? The legal system? Cleaning products? Basic biology? Foreign language? Kitchen appliances? Cosmic background radiation? The amount of modern life that is spent on avoiding scams is incredible.
For the longest time, writing was more expensive than reading. If you encountered a body of written text, you could be sure that at the very least, a human spent some time writing it down. The text used to have an innate proof-of-thought, a basic token of humanity.
Now, AI has made text very, very, very cheap. Not only text, in fact. Code, images, video. All kinds of media. We can’t rely on proof-of-thought anymore. Any text can be AI slop. If you read it, you’re injured in this war.
– Alex Martsinovich: It’s rude to show AI output to people
We’re very worried about AI doing human things. We should be equally worried about humans doing AI things—optimizing hard, understanding nothing.
Joan Westenberg på Mastodon – link til indlæg
I’ve never had an issue with the anthropomorphization of digital processes. When someone says “if you enter this kind of command, the tool knows that it needs to look up this thing over here”, it’s an adequate metaphor of what’s happening, and the language flows well. People get a decent visualization of boxes and arrows in their heads that captures what the processes are doing.
It’s different when you’re anthropomorphizing an LLM. Please don’t, be very technical and precise about what it does. There’s a kind of uncanny valley of behavior that makes the metaphor collapse.
Clacke på Mastodon – link til indlæg
Every time a tech company says “We’re focused on improving the user experience,” a beloved feature dies, they add chatGPT and their CEO donates $100m to the nearest Nazi
Kilde: Why Led By Donkeys Targeted Elon Musk with projection on Tesla Factory in Berlin – https://streetartutopia.com/2025/01/23/elon-musk-tesla-factory-street-art/
Code generation tools fix the problem of software development being slow and expensive in much the same way that faster cars fix traffic congestion.
– Jason Gorman på Mastodon – Link
How unfillable is the hole in your soul that one could be the literal richest person in the world and then be upset that America has an agency that helps the poorest in the world?
– Dare Obasanjo på Mastodon – link
Cynicism is the cheap seats. It’s the fast food of intellectual positions. Anyone can point at something and say it’s broken, corrupt, or destined to fail. The real challenge? Building something better.
The cynic sees a proposal for change and immediately lists why it won’t work. They’re usually right about specific failure modes — systems are complex, and failure has many mothers. But being right about potential problems differs from being right about the whole.
– Joan Westenberg: We Don’t Need More Cynics. We Need More Builders.