Entropisk mareridt

Current “AI” from my perspective is less like a technological breakthrough—“the genie is out of the bottle”—and more a research fusion reactor: no matter how much energy and money you throw at the thing, nothing changes the fact that it costs more energy than it produces All that scaling it up accomplishes is waste. LLM true believers are effectively arguing their tech accomplishes free energy when the costs mean it’s effectively the opposite

Baldur Bjarnason på Mastodon – link til indlæg

Dannelse er selvforsvar

I have never found an instance of “when am I ever going to need to know this?” that couldn’t be responded to with, “When people try to scam you by exploiting your ignorance.” Math? Statistics? Historical events? The legal system? Cleaning products? Basic biology? Foreign language? Kitchen appliances? Cosmic background radiation? The amount of modern life that is spent on avoiding scams is incredible.

Al Sweigartlink til indlæg

Proof of thought

For the longest time, writing was more expensive than reading. If you encountered a body of written text, you could be sure that at the very least, a human spent some time writing it down. The text used to have an innate proof-of-thought, a basic token of humanity.

Now, AI has made text very, very, very cheap. Not only text, in fact. Code, images, video. All kinds of media. We can’t rely on proof-of-thought anymore. Any text can be AI slop. If you read it, you’re injured in this war.

– Alex Martsinovich: It’s rude to show AI output to people