Personlighed som metafor – eller som illusion

I’ve never had an issue with the anthropomorphization of digital processes. When someone says „if you enter this kind of command, the tool knows that it needs to look up this thing over here‟, it’s an adequate metaphor of what’s happening, and the language flows well. People get a decent visualization of boxes and arrows in their heads that captures what the processes are doing.

It’s different when you’re anthropomorphizing an LLM. Please don’t, be very technical and precise about what it does. There’s a kind of uncanny valley of behavior that makes the metaphor collapse.

Clacke på Mastodon – link til indlæg

Indgroet ubehag

People learn to use terrible UI all the time. It’s not good to dismiss complaints about UI, because that’s insular. And the insular quality isn’t very welcoming.

But email remains a dominant force in communication. If email were invented today everyone would have to use gmail or not be able to email someone not on the same service. A few crazy people would talk about „open email‟ and try to get people to try it.

Mymepropagandist på Mastodon (link)

Den bløde bøde

If a „fine‟ is less than the profit from the infraction, it’s not a fine, it’s a business expense.

If a „fine‟ isn’t a fixed percentage of assets, it’s not a fine, it’s a poor tax.

If a „fine‟ only serves to enrich the government, not to make those harmed by the infraction whole, it’s not a fine, it’s a revenue stream.

If a „fine‟ is adjudicated by people who profit from the business being fined, it’s not a fine, it’s a stock buyback.

Intertial Invites på Mastodon (link til indlæg)